The Royal Silence: The Struggles of Mental Health in Monarchies

In recent years, conversations surrounding mental health have become more prevalent. Public figures, including some members of royal families, have played a role in destigmatizing these issues. However, not all royal families approach the topic in the same way.

This essay delves into the contrast between the Dutch and Spanish royal families regarding mental health and explores the broader implications of this disparity, with a particular focus on the actions of Princess Amalia of the Netherlands and the silence surrounding Queen Letizia of Spain and her family’s struggles.

A Silent Tragedy: Erika Ortiz’s Passing

Queen Letizia of Spain faced one of the most personal and painful tragedies in her family’s history when her sister, Erika Ortiz, died by suicide.

This event, which took place during Letizia’s tenure as a public figure, has remained a taboo topic within the Spanish Royal Household.

Despite its emotional gravity, the family has never openly addressed it, nor has it used its platform to advocate for mental health awareness.

The lack of acknowledgment has led to criticism, as some argue that the Spanish monarchy has missed an opportunity to champion mental health causes.

The passing of Erika Ortiz is not just a private tragedy but also a moment where the family could have chosen to address a universal issue. Their silence, critics suggest, perpetuates the stigma surrounding mental health and mental illnesses, especially in high-profile families.

It’s essential to recognize that mental health struggles are not unique to any class, status, or nation.

The pain that families experience when losing a loved one to mental health issues is universal. For the Spanish Royal Family, however, this silence raises questions about the role of monarchies in using their platform for public good.

Princess Amalia: A Courageous Voice for Mental Health

In stark contrast, Princess Amalia of the Netherlands has taken an entirely different approach. As the heir to the Dutch throne, Amalia has been open about her mental health journey.

She has publicly acknowledged seeking therapy and consulting a psychologist, especially in light of her aunt Inés Zorreguieta’s suicide in 2018.

By openly discussing her experiences, Amalia has normalized seeking help, making it clear that even future queens can struggle and seek support.

Amalia’s openness reflects a shift in modern monarchies. Instead of adhering to outdated traditions of silence and stoicism, she has embraced vulnerability. In her biography, written with her consent, Amalia speaks about the importance of mental health care.

She recounts how visiting a psychologist as a child helped her cope with her challenges and how she continues to seek therapy when needed.

Her statements emphasize that mental health care is not a weakness but a sign of strength. By addressing her struggles, she not only sheds light on the importance of mental health but also sets an example for others, particularly young people, who may feel ashamed to seek help.

Cultural Differences in Royal Approaches

The contrasting approaches of the Spanish and Dutch royal families reveal cultural and institutional differences. In the Netherlands, there is a growing culture of openness and honesty about mental health.

Dutch society values transparency, and this ethos is reflected in its royal family. Queen Maxima, Amalia’s mother, has also faced personal tragedies, including her sister’s suicide, but she has chosen to confront these issues openly.

On the other hand, Spain’s monarchy remains steeped in tradition and formality. Queen Letizia, who has faced intense scrutiny since marrying into the royal family, has maintained a strict boundary between her personal life and public duties.

While this approach may protect the family’s privacy, it also perpetuates the stigma that mental health struggles should remain hidden.

Critics argue that Queen Letizia and her family could take inspiration from the Dutch royals. By addressing Erika Ortiz’s death and the impact it had on their family, they could destigmatize mental health issues and encourage others to seek help.

Furthermore, as a mother and role model, Letizia could use her position to support initiatives promoting mental health, particularly among young people.

The Role of Monarchies in Public Advocacy

Modern monarchies no longer wield political power in the traditional sense, but they hold significant influence as cultural and social leaders. Their actions, words, and public appearances carry weight, shaping public opinion and inspiring societal change.

In this context, addressing mental health issues is not just a moral imperative but also a strategic opportunity for monarchies to remain relevant in the modern world.

Princess Amalia’s advocacy for mental health exemplifies this potential. By sharing her experiences, she connects with the public on a deeply personal level, demonstrating that royals, too, are human.

This relatability strengthens the monarchy’s image and ensures its continued relevance in a rapidly changing world.

In contrast, the Spanish Royal Family’s reluctance to address mental health issues risks alienating them from the public. In an era where transparency and authenticity are valued, their silence can be perceived as outdated and disconnected.

For younger generations, who prioritize mental health and well-being, this silence may even diminish their support for the monarchy.

A Missed Opportunity for Queen Letizia and Princess Leonor

The Spanish Royal Family has a unique opportunity to address mental health issues, given their personal experiences. Queen Letizia, as a mother and a public figure, could lead by example, advocating for mental health resources and support systems.

Princess Leonor, as the heir to the throne, could follow in Amalia’s footsteps by speaking openly about these issues.

Such advocacy would not only honor Erika Ortiz’s memory but also provide hope and support to countless individuals facing similar struggles.

By acknowledging their pain and using their platform for good, the Spanish Royal Family could turn a private tragedy into a public service.

The Broader Implications of Royal Advocacy

When royals like Princess Amalia speak out about mental health, the impact extends far beyond their immediate audience.

Their words resonate with people from all walks of life, encouraging them to seek help and breaking down the barriers of stigma. In a world where mental health challenges are increasingly common, such advocacy is more important than ever.

Moreover, royal advocacy for mental health can inspire systemic change. By highlighting the importance of mental health care, royals can encourage governments and organizations to invest in resources, research, and support systems.

Their influence can drive policy changes that benefit entire populations, making mental health care more accessible and effective.

Conclusion: The Power of Vulnerability

The contrasting approaches of Princess Amalia and Queen Letizia to mental health highlight the evolving role of monarchies in modern society.

While Amalia’s openness represents a progressive and empathetic approach, Letizia’s silence reflects the challenges of balancing tradition with modern expectations.

As society continues to prioritize mental health, monarchies must adapt to remain relevant and influential. By embracing vulnerability and using their platforms to advocate for important causes, royals can inspire change and connect with the public on a deeper level.

For the Spanish Royal Family, this means addressing their past with honesty and courage, turning their private pain into a beacon of hope for others.

Ultimately, the legacy of modern monarchies will be defined not by their adherence to tradition but by their ability to adapt and lead with compassion.

Princess Amalia has set a powerful example, demonstrating that vulnerability is not a weakness but a strength. It remains to be seen whether other royal families, including Spain’s, will follow her lead and embrace the transformative power of honesty and empathy.